Machine Learning-Based Clustering for Program Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • W. Wahyudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Lala Septem Riza Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • E. Erlangga Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dwi Novia Al Husaeni Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v5i1.5953

Keywords:

Clustering, Curriculum evaluation, CPL, Machine learning, Graduate Learning Outcomes, Higher education, Students

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the application of machine learning-based clustering algorithms in the evaluation of Graduate Learning Outcomes (CPL) in higher education. The review was conducted using the PRISMA approach on articles published in the Scopus database during the period 2020–2025. A total of 52 articles were analyzed to identify trends in the algorithms used, implementation challenges, and their contributions to curriculum development. The findings show that algorithms such as K-Means, Hierarchical Clustering, and Fuzzy C-Means are frequently used in mapping student competencies. However, their implementation in practice remains limited due to insufficient model validation, lack of justification for algorithm selection, and a disconnect between analytical results and academic decision-making. This situation reflects a broader issue in the integration of machine learning into educational contexts, where the technical potential of algorithms has not yet been fully translated into meaningful pedagogical impact. As a conceptual contribution, this study develops a machine learning-based computational model that includes the stages of CPL data collection, preprocessing, cluster modeling, result evaluation, and integration into curriculum policy. The proposed model is designed to enhance transparency, adaptability, and evidence-based decision-making in curriculum management systems. This study also highlights the need for the development of soft clustering techniques, integration with digital learning systems, and attention to the ethics and transparency of algorithms in data-based evaluation. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of bridging the gap between algorithmic analysis and applicable educational strategies within higher education institutions.

References

Akbar, M., and Irianto, D. (2023, October). Usulan sistem penilaian capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah (CPMK) dalam menunjang penilaian capaian pembelajaran lulusan (CPL) Program Studi. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Industri (SENASTI), 1, 974-984.

Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A., Laws, A., Keight, R., Lunn, J., and Radi, N. (2017, May). Machine learning approaches to predict learning outcomes in Massive open online courses. In 2017 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 713-720). IEEE.

Biggs, J., Tang, C., and Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Candra, O., Putra, A., Islami, S., Yanto, D. T. P., Revina, R., and Yolanda, R. (2023). Work willingness of VHS students at post-industrial placement. TEM Journal, 12(1), 265.

Charlton, N., and Newsham-West, R. (2024). Enablers and barriers to program-level assessment planning. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(5), 1074-1088.

Chowdhury, M. A., Chisty, K. K. S., Tushar, H., Ahmed, K. M. F., and Waliullah, S. S. A. (2023). Automating assessment and evaluation for a bachelor’s degree program. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 2037.

Drastiawati, N. S., Yunitasari, B., Ningsih, T. H., Irfa’i, M. A., Adiwibowo, P. H., and Rasyid, A. H. A. (2023). Analysis of outcome-based education (OBE) on the achievement of the program learning outcomes (PLO) in welding design course. Proceedings of Vocational Engineering International Conference, 5, 423–427.

Farida, A., and Sudibyo, N. A. (2022). Implementation of the K-Means Algorithm on Learning Outcomes and Self-Regulated Learning. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 147-154.

Harefa, E. (2024). Predicting science learning outcomes of elementary students in rural area using machine learning algorithms. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6), 3780-3792.

Hariyanto, D. C. (2023). Analisis K-Means dan Self Organizing Maps pada data relevansi program studi dan pekerjaan lulusan S1 Informatika (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).

Luo, Y., Han, X., and Zhang, C. (2024). Prediction of learning outcomes with a machine learning algorithm based on online learning behavior data in blended courses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 267-285.

Mahboob, K., Ali, S. A., and Laila, U. E. (2020). Investigating learning outcomes in engineering education with data mining. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1652-1670.

Mian, S. H., Salah, B., Ameen, W., Moiduddin, K., and Alkhalefah, H. (2020). Adapting universities for sustainability education in industry 4.0: Channel of challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(15), 6100.

Milligan, G. W., and Hirtle, S. C. (2003). Clustering and classification methods. Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology, 2, 165-186.

Mohamed Nafuri, A. F., Sani, N. S., Zainudin, N. F. A., Rahman, A. H. A., and Aliff, M. (2022). Clustering analysis for classifying student academic performance in higher education. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9467.

Passarella, R., Oktariani, G., Kurniawan, D., and Sari, P. (2022). Using the agglomerative hierarchical clustering method to examine human factors in Indonesian aviation accidents. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(9).

Petrychenko, O., Petrichenko, I., Burmaka, I., and Vynohradova, A. (2023). Changes in modern university: challenges of today and development trends. Transport systems and technologies, (41), 74-83.

Phanniphong, K., Nuankaew, P., Teeraputon, D., Nuankaew, W., Boontonglek, M., & Bussaman, S. (2019, January). Clustering of learners performance based on learning outcomes for finding significant courses. In 2019 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT-NCON) (pp. 192-196).

Prasetyawati, A. M., Saragih, W., Frima, M., and Romadhony, A. (2025, February). Analyzing of the Alignment between Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs) and Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) Using Textual Similarity-Based Methods. In 2025 International Conference on Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information System (ICADEIS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Rahman, M. M., Watanobe, Y., Matsumoto, T., Kiran, R. U., and Nakamura, K. (2022). Educational data mining to support programming learning using problem-solving data. IEEE Access, 10, 26186-26202.

Sunarya, A., Nurmika, S. L., and Asmainah, N. (2020). Evaluation model of students learning outcome using k-means algorithm. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(2), 022027.

Tariq, M. B., and Habib, H. A. (2024). A reinforcement learning based recommendation system to improve performance of students in outcome-based education model. IEEE Access.

Zainudin, S., Ibrahim, R. A., and Sarim, H. M. (2024). Combining Cluster Quality Index and Supervised Learning to Predict Students' Academic Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 13(1).

Zayani, H. M., Abdelfattah, W., Sellami, R., Slimane, J. B., and Kachoukh, A. (2024). A framework for efficient and accurate automated CLO and PLO assessment. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 14(2), 13362–13368.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-10

How to Cite

Wahyudin, W., Riza, L. S., Erlangga, E., & Al Husaeni, D. N. (2025). Machine Learning-Based Clustering for Program Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 182–189. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v5i1.5953